Experiments with the Negotiated Boolean Queries of the TREC 2007 Legal Discovery Track
نویسنده
چکیده
We analyze the results of several experimental runs submitted for the TREC 2007 Legal Track (also sometimes known as the Legal Discovery Track). We submitted 4 boolean query runs (the initial proposal by the defendant, the rejoinder by the plaintiff, the final negotiated query, and a variation of the final query which had proximity distances doubled). We submitted 2 vector query runs (one based on the keywords of the final negotiated query, and another based on the (natural language) request text). We submitted a blind feedback run based on the final negotiated boolean query. Finally, we submitted a fusion run of the final boolean, request text and final vector runs. We found that none of the runs had a higher mean estimated Recall@B than the original final negotiated boolean query.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of Query Formulations in the Negotiated Query Refinement Process of Legal e-Discovery: UMKC at TREC 2007 Legal Track
UMKC participated in the 2007 legal track. Our experiments focused mainly on evaluating the different query formulations in the negotiated query refinement process of legal e-discovery. For our study, we considered three sets of paired runs in vector space model and language model respectively. Our experiments indicated that although the Boolean query negotiating process was successful for the ...
متن کاملExperiments with the Negotiated Boolean Queries of the TREC 2006 Legal Discovery Track
We analyze the results of several experimental runs submitted to the Legal Discovery and Terabyte Tracks of TREC 2006. In the Legal Track, the final negotiated boolean queries produced higher mean scores in average precision and Precision@10 than a corresponding vector run of the same query terms, but the vector run usually recalled more relevant items by rank 5000, and on average the boolean q...
متن کاملExperiments with the Negotiated Boolean Queries of the TREC 2009 Legal Track
For our participation in the Batch Task of the TREC 2009 Legal Track, we produced several retrieval sets to compare experimental Boolean, vector, fusion and relevance feedback techniques for e-Discovery requests. In this paper, we have reported not just the mean scores of the experimental approaches but also the largest per-topic impacts of the techniques for several measures. The experimental ...
متن کاملExperiments with the Negotiated Boolean Queries of the TREC 2008 Legal Track
We analyze the results of several experimental runs submitted for the TREC 2008 Legal Track. In the Ad Hoc task, we found that rank-based merging of vector results with the reference Boolean results produced a statistically significant increase in mean F1@K and Recall@B compared to just using the reference Boolean results. In the Relevance Feedback task, we found that the investigated relevance...
متن کاملUniversity of Amsterdam at the TREC 2007 Legal Track
In this paper, we document our official submissions to the TREC 2007 Legal track. Our main aims were two-fold: First, we experimented with using different query formulations trying to exploit the verbose topic statements. Second, we analysed how ranked retrieval methods can be fruitfully combined with traditional Boolean queries. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. First, we got mix...
متن کامل